The Tu Quoque fallacy (Latin for "you, too") is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone responds to criticism or an accusation by pointing out that the accuser has done the same thing. Rather than addressing the substance of the original claim, the respondent attempts to undermine the accuser's credibility by highlighting their hypocrisy. It is classified as a subcategory of the ad hominem fallacy because it attacks the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
The key feature of Tu Quoque is that it does not address whether the original accusation is valid. Even if the accuser is guilty of the same behavior, that fact has no bearing on whether the accused person's actions were wrong. For example, if someone criticizes you for lying and you respond by saying "Well, you lied last week," you have not shown that your lying was acceptable — you have only shown that the other person is also imperfect. The original criticism remains unaddressed.
Tu Quoque is commonly seen in political debates, where politicians deflect accusations by pointing to their opponents' records. It also appears frequently in everyday arguments between friends, family members, and colleagues. In legal contexts, defendants may sometimes attempt to deflect blame by highlighting similar behavior from their accusers, though such arguments are generally not accepted as valid defenses.
It is important to distinguish Tu Quoque from the related "Two Wrongs Make a Right" fallacy. While both involve responding to accusations of wrongdoing, Tu Quoque specifically targets the accuser's behavior to imply hypocrisy, whereas Two Wrongs Make a Right more broadly argues that a wrong action is justified because others have committed similar wrongs. Recognizing Tu Quoque helps us stay focused on the actual issue being debated rather than being sidetracked by counter-accusations.