Anaphora is the repetition of the same word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or sentences. The repetition is not decoration; it is the structure. Each return to the same opening signals that what follows belongs to a series, and the series accumulates a weight that no single sentence could carry alone.

It is the most durable device in English oratory, and one of the easiest to spot once it has a name.

Example of Anaphora

Dickens opens A Tale of Two Cities with it: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness…” Ten clauses, each beginning the same way. Any one of them on its own is unremarkable. Together they establish a world defined by contradiction before a single character has appeared.

Note

Anaphora repeats at the start of each clause. The mirror device, repeating at the end, is epistrophe — and a passage using both at once is called symploce.

In more detail

Anaphora works on the ear before it works on the mind. Repetition at the head of a clause sets a rhythm, and once a listener has heard the pattern twice they expect it a third time. That expectation is the device's real mechanism: the audience is now participating, anticipating the shape of what comes next rather than merely receiving it.

This is also why anaphora suits spoken argument better than written. In speech the pattern is unmistakable and the pauses do half the work. On the page it can begin to feel mannered, which is why most written anaphora runs to three or four clauses where a speech might sustain ten.

The device carries no claim of its own, which is why it appears nowhere in the fallacy library. It makes a list feel inevitable, but it does not assert that the list is complete or that its items belong together. That remains the writer's job, and a reader who notices the rhythm should still ask whether the items earn their place in it.

Used badly, anaphora substitutes momentum for development — five clauses that feel like an argument progressing while in fact restating one idea five times. The test is simple: remove the repeated opening and see whether anything is left standing.